Opposes the Word of God   
 


PAUL'S LAWLESS (GOD-LESS) & BLASPHEMOUS SCRIPTURES 


If you read www.TheHeavenReligion.com (click here) and understand the 7 NT and 7 Revelation's very clear, obvious and undisputable scriptures that we need to keep BOTH the Torah ("Law") of the Father and Testimony of the Messiah and Son of God ("The Nazarene Code") to become saints in the kingdom of heaven, then the following scriptures found in 
Galatians 2:11-21 (click hereshould be very obvious that Sha'ul (Paul)'s "gospel" is sheer blasphemy and assures eternal death. Below is a small sample of this false Apostle's LAWLESS & BLASPHEMOUS preaching:

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg 15"We who are Jews by birth and not 'Gentile sinners' 16know that a man is not justified by observing the law (Torah)but by faith in Jesus Christ. So we, too, have put our faith in Christ Jesus that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by observing the law (Torah), because by observing the law (Torah) no one will be justified." 
Galatians 2:15-16


http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg  56The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law;  1 Corinthians 15:57

The above clearly refutes the very Word of the Messiah found in Matthew 7:21-23 and the other 14 like scriptures found in Chapter 2 that constitute the Nazarene Code which is to keep the Law (Torah) and the Testimony of the Messiah. 

 

Paul Opposes the Law - the Torah of the Most High

This video correctly points out the false gospel of Paul compared to that of the Messiah - however, the Law was never "Jewish" - it is of God the Most High for ALL 12 HEBREW Tribes of Israel - not just the Jews. Furthermore, the Messiah was Galilean by birth - not Judean.  Lastly, the title identifies Paul as "Apostle Paul" which is factually false. 


But there is far, far more claims made by the Pharisee that the Law is "Dead":

Below are the scriptures Christians claim are "proof positive" that "the Law" is done away with. Christian Apologists for Paul argue he was implying the Mosaic statutes and ordinances were those that were "nailed to the cross".  While "Messianics" claim he meant the oral Talmudic law.  Both groups are wrong.

Reading their original Greek versions and translated forms prove that no such distinction was ever made - he is clearly and simply stating "The Law", the "Mosaic Law" and in other cases, "the Written Law" - ALL are the TORAH. Being a typical Pharisee - a hypocrite to the core as the Messiah warned so repeatedly, he kept the Law but preached the contrary to unsuspecting masses. 

One VERY glaring and obvious fact Christian clergy, evangelical leaders and their flock overlook: NOT ONE SINGLE SCRIPTURE OPPOSING THE LAW comes from either the Messiah or any of the legitimate Apostles - NOT ONE.  
The author of each and every one of the 20 scriptures below is Paul and he alone. Only he in the entire bible goes completely against the Word of the Father, the Prophets, King David, the Messiah and the 12 true Apostles.  Who will you trust your eternal life to? 


                                                    PAUL'S ANTI-LAW SCRIPTURES

                      (He is clearly expressing the WRITTEN LAW - NOT the ORAL LAW)

* The Written Law - The Law of Moses (By extension, God the Father's Laws)
   https://www.lds.org/scriptures/bd/law-of-moses

   https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/The_Written_Law.html
   Editor's Note: The Law is for EVERYONE and created originally for ALL 12 Tribes of Israel - NOT just "Jews".

* The Oral Law - the Talmud (By extension, the Babylonian (Satanic) Talmud)
   https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/talmud_&_mishna.html
   http://chosenpeople.com/main/index.php/jewish-roots/176--the-oral-law-judaisms-roadmap-for-
  righteousness

  

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg  COL 2:14  Blotting out the HANDWRITING OF ORDINANCES that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the waynailing it to his cross;

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg  2 COR 3:7  But if the ministration of death, WRITTEN AND ENGRAVEN IN STONES, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of OF MOSES for the glory of his countenance; WHICH GLORY WAS TO BE DONE AWAY:8how will the ministry of the Spirit fail to be even more with glory? 9For if the ministry of condemnation has glory, much more does the ministry of righteousness abound in glory. 10For indeed what had glory, in this case has no glory because of the glory that surpasses it. 

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg  2 COR 11-12  For if that which is done away was with glory, much more that which remains is in glory.12Therefore having such a hope, we use great boldness in our speech, 

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg  2 COR 13  ...and ARE NOT LIKE MOSES, who used to put a veil over his face so that the sons of Israel would not look intently AT THE END OF WHICH IS ABOLISHED.  

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg  2 COR 14  But their minds were hardened; for until this very day at THE READING OF THE OLD COVENANT the same veil remains unlifted, because it is removed in Christ.

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg  EPH 2:14  For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us;

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg  EPH 2:15  Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, EVEN THE LAW OF COMMANDMENTS CONTAINED IN ORDINANCES; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace; 

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg  EPH 2:16  And that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the cross, having slain the enmity thereby:

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg  GAL 2:15  "We who are Jews by birth and not 'Gentile sinners' 16know that a man is not justified by observing THE LAW but by faith in Jesus Christ. 

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg  GAL 2:16   
So we, too, have put our faith in Christ Jesus that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by observing the law, because by observing THE LAW no one will be justified." 

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg  GAL 3:24  THE WRITTEN LAW was therefore a guide for us to The Messiah that we would be made right by faith.

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg  GAL 3:25   And now that the way of faith has come, we no longer need THE LAW as our guardian.

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg  GAL 5:18   But if you are led by The Spirit, YOU ARE NOT UNDER THE WRITTEN LAW.

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg  HEB 7:18 For there is verily a disannulling of the commandment going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof. 

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg  HEB 8:13  In that he said, “New”, he has made the first old, and that which is outdated and old is near destruction. 

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg  HEB 10:9  And afterward he said, “Behold, I have come to do your will, oh God.” In this he abolishes the first to establish the second.

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg  ROM 6:14  And sin has no authority over you, FOR YOU ARE NOT UNDER THE WRITTEN LAW, but under grace.

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg  ROM 7:4And now, my brethren, YOU ALSO HAVE DIED TO THE WRITTEN LAW with the body of The Messiah that you would be for another, The One who arose from the dead, that you would yield fruit to God.

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg  ROM 7: 6  But now we are DELIVERED FROM THE LAW, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, AND NOT IN THE OLDNESS OF THE LETTER

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg  ROM 10: 4  For Christ is the END OF THE LAW for righteousness to every one that believeth. 

It cannot be any more clear than that. And as if the above were not enough, below are Paul's specific attacks against elements of the Written (Mosaic) Law:


PAUL'S ATTACK AGAINST KEY ELEMENTS OF THE LAW (TORAH):



http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg   Paul Opposes the Law of Circumcision:

Paul argued that circumcision no longer meant the physical, but a spiritual practice.(Romans 2:25-29) And in that sense, he wrote: "Is any man called being circumcised? let him not become uncircumcised" (1 Corinthians 7:18) - probably a reference to the practice of epispasm[35]

Later Paul more explicitly denounced the practice, rejecting and condemning those who promoted circumcision to Gentile Christians. Paul warned that the advocates of circumcision (such as the true Apostles) were "false brothers".(Gal 2:4He accused Galatian Christians who advocated circumcision of turning from the Spirit to the flesh: "Are you so foolish, that, whereas you began in the Spirit, you would now be made perfect by the flesh?" (Gal 3:3He accused advocates of circumcision of wanting to make a good showing in the flesh (Gal 6:12) and of glorying or boasting of the flesh (Gal 3:13).Some believe Paul wrote the entire Epistle to the Galatians attacking circumcision and any requirement for the keeping of Jewish law by Christians, saying in chapter five: "Mark my words! I, Paul, tell you that if you let yourselves be circumcised, Christ will be of no value to you at all." (Galatians 5:2).

In a late letter he warned Christians to "Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision," (κατατομή,katatomē)[36] saying that Christians were the true circumcision because they worshiped in the Spirit of God (Phil 3:2-3).

Florentine Bechtel (1910) The Catholic Encyclopedia: Judaizers[37] notes: "Paul, on the other hand, not only did not object to the observance of the Mosaic Law, as long as it did not interfere with the liberty of the Gentilesbut he conformed to its prescriptions when occasion required (1 Corinthians 9:20). Thus he shortly after circumcised Timothy (Acts 16:1-3), and he was in the very act of observing the Mosaic ritual when he was arrested at Jerusalem (Acts 21:26)."
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision_controversy_in_early_Christianity 


http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg   Paul Opposes the Father's Dietary Law

Do Not Cause Your Brother to Stumble

13Therefore let us not judge one another anymore, but rather determine this-- not to put an obstacle or a stumbling block in a brother's way. 14 I know and am convinced in the Lord Jesus that nothing is unclean in itself; but to him who thinks anything to be unclean, to him it is unclean.
15For if because of food your brother is hurt, you are no longer walking according to love. Do not destroy with your food him for whom Christ died." Romans 14:13-15

The article Paul on Food Laws (http://www.lambsdenoftruth.com/paulonfoodlaws.htm ) goes into far greater detail and CLEARLY demonstrates Sha'ul's complete OPPOSITION of dietary laws that the Father AND the Messiah commands.

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg  Paul Opposes the Sabbath - the Father's Law and Holy Day

The Roman Catholic Church and Christians in general use Colossians 2:16-17 and Colossians 2:14 to say that they are not required to observe the Sabbath and holy days claiming that the law was abolished and nailed to the cross, and partly from having a carnal mind, which is enmity against God and His law (Romans 8:7). Sha'ul (Paul) is saying in verse 16,"Therefore [since the law is done away] don't let anyone condemn you for eating unclean meats or not observing the Sabbath or holy days." Consequently, verse 17 is interpreted to mean that Paul dismisses the Sabbath and holy days as unimportant symbols of future events, while emphasizing that the only truly substantive Christian need is belief in Christ. From this, Christians conclude that we should not concern themselves about these days because, since Christ died, their observance is not required. And yet, Christians overlook the fact Sha'ul taught Jews and Greeks on the Sabbath (Acts 18:4).

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg   Paul Teaches Against Keeping the Father's Holy Feast Days

Galatians:4:9-11 and Colossians:2:16-17 are the main “proof texts” cited as evidence that Paul taught against the Holy Days though he hypocritically kept them (1 Corinthians 5:8Acts 18:20 and Acts 18:21 which several modern bibles have removed "the feast" entirely - why? always remember that the Evil one rules the world today). Sha'ul's hypocrisy and heresy not only contradicts the Law and Word of the Father and Messiah, but it denies the profound significance of the second coming of Yeshaya His Father foretold us would return by the Fall of the biblical Feast Days. 

Challenge yourself to find ONE single scripture where the Messiah or any legitimate Apostle claims that the Law or any part of it has been done away with - you won't.  Scripturally ignorant individuals or those in denial claim Paul was talking about the Talmud or the oral law - the above texts prove beyond any doubt he is speaking of the 'Mosaic' written Law handed down by the Father.

IF MANY THOUSANDS OF JEWS knew Paul was teaching against the Law - imagine how many Gentiles who were ignorant of the condition of keeping the Law were deceived. That is why everywhere west that Paul took his heretical gospel which ultimately ended in Rome practices a Lawless (Torah-less) gospel. This is the most damning evidence against him and is as obvious and as undeniable as can be which is why the entire Christian world does NOT KEEP THE TORAH and thus the WHOLE WORLD HAS BEEN DECEIVED to keep it.   

To believe that Gentiles had some unique privilege or right to be excluded from observing the Law is simply not the case.  It is not Gentiles fault to have been led astray by Paul - but they can read the bible for themselves or simply have an open mind to read, listen or watch others who defend the keeping of the Law and the reasons behind it.


What does the above make Paul? a HERETIC of the Word of God.

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg  Paul Opposes the Law of Circumcision:

Paul argued that circumcision no longer meant the physical, but a spiritual practice.(Romans 2:25-29) And in that sense, he wrote: "Is any man called being circumcised? let him not become uncircumcised" (1 Corinthians 7:18) - probably a reference to the practice of epispasm[35]

Later Paul more explicitly denounced the practice, rejecting and condemning those who promoted circumcision to Gentile Christians. Paul warned that the advocates of circumcision (such as the true Apostles) were "false brothers".(Gal 2:4He accused Galatian Christians who advocated circumcision of turning from the Spirit to the flesh: "Are you so foolish, that, whereas you began in the Spirit, you would now be made perfect by the flesh?" (Gal 3:3He accused advocates of circumcision of wanting to make a good showing in the flesh (Gal 6:12) and of glorying or boasting of the flesh (Gal 3:13).Some believe Paul wrote the entire Epistle to the Galatians attacking circumcision and any requirement for the keeping of Jewish law by Christians, saying in chapter five: "Mark my words! I, Paul, tell you that if you let yourselves be circumcised, Christ will be of no value to you at all." (Galatians 5:2).

In a late letter he warned Christians to "Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision," (κατατομή,katatomē)[36] saying that Christians were the true circumcision because they worshiped in the Spirit of God (Phil 3:2-3).

Florentine Bechtel (1910) The Catholic Encyclopedia: Judaizers[37] notes: "Paul, on the other hand, not only did not object to the observance of the Mosaic Law, as long as it did not interfere with the liberty of the Gentilesbut he conformed to its prescriptions when occasion required (1 Corinthians 9:20). Thus he shortly after circumcised Timothy (Acts 16:1-3), and he was in the very act of observing the Mosaic ritual when he was arrested at Jerusalem (Acts 21:26)."
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision_controversy_in_early_Christianity 


http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg   Paul Opposes the Father's Dietary Law

Do Not Cause Your Brother to Stumble

13Therefore let us not judge one another anymore, but rather determine this-- not to put an obstacle or a stumbling block in a brother's way. 14 I know and am convinced in the Lord Jesus that nothing is unclean in itself; but to him who thinks anything to be unclean, to him it is unclean.
15For if because of food your brother is hurt, you are no longer walking according to love. Do not destroy with your food him for whom Christ died." Romans 14:13-15

The article Paul on Food Laws (http://www.lambsdenoftruth.com/paulonfoodlaws.htm ) goes into far greater detail and CLEARLY demonstrates Sha'ul's complete OPPOSITION of dietary laws that the Father AND the Messiah commands.

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg  Paul Opposes the Sabbath - the Father's Law and Holy Day

The Roman Catholic Church and Christians in general use Colossians 2:16-17 and Colossians 2:14 to say that they are not required to observe the Sabbath and holy days claiming that the law was abolished and nailed to the cross, and partly from having a carnal mind, which is enmity against God and His law (Romans 8:7). Sha'ul (Paul) is saying in verse 16,"Therefore [since the law is done away] don't let anyone condemn you for eating unclean meats or not observing the Sabbath or holy days." Consequently, verse 17 is interpreted to mean that Paul dismisses the Sabbath and holy days as unimportant symbols of future events, while emphasizing that the only truly substantive Christian need is belief in Christ. From this, Christians conclude that we should not concern themselves about these days because, since Christ died, their observance is not required. And yet, Christians overlook the fact Sha'ul taught Jews and Greeks on the Sabbath (Acts 18:4).

http://whbq.images.worldnow.com/images/24489427_BG1.jpg   Paul Teaches Against Keeping the Father's Holy Feast Days

Galatians:4:9-11 and Colossians:2:16-17 are the main “proof texts” cited as evidence that Paul taught against the Holy Days though he hypocritically kept them (1 Corinthians 5:8Acts 18:20 and Acts 18:21 which several modern bibles have removed "the feast" entirely - why? always remember that the Evil one rules the world today). Sha'ul's hypocrisy and heresy not only contradicts the Law and Word of the Father and Messiah, but it denies the profound significance of the second coming of Yashaya His Father foretold us would return by the Fall of the biblical Feast Days. 

CONCLUSION: PAUL TAUGHT A LAWLESS (TORAH-LESS & GOD-LESS) GOSPEL


                To know which faith we are supposed to keep to enter the Kingdom of Heaven visit: 

                                                                     TheHeavenReligion.com (here)